Loyola Marymount
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
126  Danielle Shanahan JR 20:07
367  Kelli Sugimoto SR 20:42
515  Kayla de Bondt JR 20:56
665  Emily Hubert FR 21:10
937  Chloe Curtis SR 21:30
966  Lorena Garcia JR 21:32
993  Madelyn Vorgitch FR 21:34
1,111  Samantha Garcia SR 21:43
1,555  Elena Garcia FR 22:13
National Rank #74 of 339
West Region Rank #13 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 12th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.6%
Top 10 in Regional 24.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Danielle Shanahan Kelli Sugimoto Kayla de Bondt Emily Hubert Chloe Curtis Lorena Garcia Madelyn Vorgitch Samantha Garcia Elena Garcia
Capital Cross Challenge 10/03 892 20:22 20:37 20:20 21:15 21:19 21:52 22:05 21:58 22:02
Santa Clara Bronco Invitational 10/17 981 20:18 20:41 20:57 21:23 21:42 21:24 21:35 21:41 22:10
Titan Invitational 10/23 1306
West Coast Conference 10/31 927 20:01 20:51 20:58 20:52 21:33 21:27 22:14 22:34
West Region Championships 11/13 963 20:03 20:43 21:31 21:13 21:27 21:21 21:16
NCAA Championship 11/21 20:00





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 28.6 689 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 12.3 369 0.6 1.4 2.2 3.6 6.8 9.5 12.7 15.0 14.5 12.6 10.5 5.8 3.2 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Danielle Shanahan 27.6% 88.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Kelli Sugimoto 0.3% 162.5
Kayla de Bondt 0.1% 198.5
Emily Hubert 0.1% 197.5
Chloe Curtis 0.1% 236.8
Lorena Garcia 0.1% 240.5
Madelyn Vorgitch 0.1% 238.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Danielle Shanahan 21.7 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.8 3.1 3.0 3.3 3.3 2.8 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.0 3.1 3.3
Kelli Sugimoto 59.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3
Kayla de Bondt 76.6 0.0
Emily Hubert 94.3
Chloe Curtis 123.8
Lorena Garcia 126.6
Madelyn Vorgitch 129.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.6% 17.9% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 5
6 1.4% 1.4 6
7 2.2% 2.2 7
8 3.6% 3.6 8
9 6.8% 6.8 9
10 9.5% 9.5 10
11 12.7% 12.7 11
12 15.0% 15.0 12
13 14.5% 14.5 13
14 12.6% 12.6 14
15 10.5% 10.5 15
16 5.8% 5.8 16
17 3.2% 3.2 17
18 1.0% 1.0 18
19 0.4% 0.4 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 0.0% 0.0 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
California 5.3% 1.0 0.1
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0